Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva vs Berberechos al natural S
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filetes de melva en aceite d... | Berberechos al natural S |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 178 kcal | 65 kcal |
| Fat | 8.3 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 1.5 g |
| Protein | 24.7 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Berberechos al natural S has 63% fewer calories (65 kcal vs 178 kcal).
- Berberechos al natural S has 88% less fat (1 g vs 8.3 g).
- Berberechos al natural S has 79% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
- Berberechos al natural S has no sugar, while Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 0.5 g.
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 33% less salt (1 g vs 1.5 g).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has 43% more protein (24.7 g vs 14 g).
- Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Berberechos al natural S lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva
Melva (66%), aceite de oliva (33%) y sal.
Berberechos al natural S
Berberechos, agua, sal,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filetes de melva en aceite de oliva or Berberechos al natural S?
Neither product is clearly better overall — it depends on what matters most to you. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Berberechos al natural S has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 178 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Berberechos al natural S has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.