Wild Pacific Red Salmon vs Berberechos al natural S
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Pacific Red Salmon | Berberechos al natural S |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 159 kcal | 65 kcal |
| Fat | 7.3 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 14 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Molluscs |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Berberechos al natural S has 59% fewer calories (65 kcal vs 159 kcal).
- Berberechos al natural S has 86% less fat (1 g vs 7.3 g).
- Berberechos al natural S has 79% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 1.4 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has no salt, while Berberechos al natural S has 1.5 g.
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 40% more protein (23.5 g vs 14 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Wild Pacific Red Salmon lists: Fish.
- Only Berberechos al natural S lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Wild Pacific Red Salmon
0513226 0517129 New CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD MSC www.msc.org Nixe Hing High WILD PACIFIC RED SALMON TM
Berberechos al natural S
Berberechos, agua, sal,
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Pacific Red Salmon or Berberechos al natural S?
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Berberechos al natural S has fewer calories: 65 kcal versus 159 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.