Comparison
Makreel in blik vs Paté de atún con aceitunas
Overall, Makreel in blik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Makreel in blik | Paté de atún con aceitunas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 260 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 19 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.8 g | 3.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 21 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Makreel in blik has 14% less fat (19 g vs 22 g).
- Makreel in blik has 22% less saturated fat (2.8 g vs 3.6 g).
- Makreel in blik has no sugar, while Paté de atún con aceitunas has 1 g.
- Makreel in blik has 43% more protein (21 g vs 12 g).
- Makreel in blik has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Makreel in blik
Makreelfilets, koolzaadolie 31 %, water, zout.
Paté de atún con aceitunas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Makreel in blik or Paté de atún con aceitunas?
Overall, Makreel in blik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Paté de atún con aceitunas has fewer calories: 257 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Makreel in blik has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Makreel in blik vs Filetes de melva en acei...
Paté de atún con aceitun... vs Filetes de melva en acei...
Makreel in blik vs Berberechos al natural S
Paté de atún con aceitun... vs Berberechos al natural S
Wild Pacific Red Salmon vs Makreel in blik
Makreel in blik vs Berberechos al natural X...
Crème de Moules vs Makreel in blik
Préparation pour sandwic... vs Makreel in blik