Préparation pour sandwich vs Makreel in blik
Overall, Préparation pour sandwich has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Préparation pour sandwich | Makreel in blik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 203 kcal | 260 kcal |
| Fat | 15 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 13 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Préparation pour sandwich has 22% fewer calories (203 kcal vs 260 kcal).
- Préparation pour sandwich has 21% less fat (15 g vs 19 g).
- Préparation pour sandwich has 46% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.8 g).
- Makreel in blik has no sugar, while Préparation pour sandwich has 1.1 g.
- Makreel in blik has 38% more protein (21 g vs 13 g).
Ingredients
Préparation pour sandwich
filet de saumon rose du pacifique huile de colza butternut eau oeuf oignon tomates mi-sechees jus de saumon wakame jus de citron fibre de chicorée, de lin et d'agrumes farine de riz gingembre sel thym citron épices poivre
Makreel in blik
Makreelfilets, koolzaadolie 31 %, water, zout.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Préparation pour sandwich or Makreel in blik?
Overall, Préparation pour sandwich has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Préparation pour sandwich has fewer calories: 203 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Makreel in blik has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.