Comparison
Crème de Moules vs Makreel in blik
Overall, Makreel in blik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Crème de Moules | Makreel in blik |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 183 kcal | 260 kcal |
| Fat | 13 g | 19 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 2.8 g |
| Sugars | 2 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 9.1 g | 21 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Crème de Moules has 30% fewer calories (183 kcal vs 260 kcal).
- Crème de Moules has 32% less fat (13 g vs 19 g).
- Makreel in blik has no sugar, while Crème de Moules has 2 g.
- Makreel in blik has 27% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.1 g).
- Makreel in blik has 57% more protein (21 g vs 9.1 g).
- Makreel in blik has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Crème de Moules
Not available.
Makreel in blik
Makreelfilets, koolzaadolie 31 %, water, zout.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Crème de Moules or Makreel in blik?
Overall, Makreel in blik has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Crème de Moules has fewer calories: 183 kcal versus 260 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Makreel in blik has less sugar: 0 g versus 2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Makreel in blik vs Filetes de melva en acei...
Crème de Moules vs Filetes de melva en acei...
Makreel in blik vs Berberechos al natural S
Crème de Moules vs Berberechos al natural S
Wild Pacific Red Salmon vs Makreel in blik
Makreel in blik vs Berberechos al natural X...
Makreel in blik vs Paté de atún con aceitun...
Préparation pour sandwic... vs Makreel in blik