Wild Pacific Red Salmon vs Paté de atún con aceitunas
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Wild Pacific Red Salmon | Paté de atún con aceitunas |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 159 kcal | 257 kcal |
| Fat | 7.3 g | 22 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.4 g | 3.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 23.5 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 38% fewer calories (159 kcal vs 257 kcal).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 67% less fat (7.3 g vs 22 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 61% less saturated fat (1.4 g vs 3.6 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has no sugar, while Paté de atún con aceitunas has 1 g.
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has no salt, while Paté de atún con aceitunas has 0.9 g.
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has 49% more protein (23.5 g vs 12 g).
- Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Wild Pacific Red Salmon lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Wild Pacific Red Salmon
0513226 0517129 New CERTIFIED SUSTAINABLE SEAFOOD MSC www.msc.org Nixe Hing High WILD PACIFIC RED SALMON TM
Paté de atún con aceitunas
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Wild Pacific Red Salmon or Paté de atún con aceitunas?
Overall, Wild Pacific Red Salmon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has fewer calories: 159 kcal versus 257 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Wild Pacific Red Salmon has less sugar: 0 g versus 1 g per 100 g.