COUSCOUS 450g passage en 400g 3 250 392 947 200 24034281 3250392280956 19416519 vs Couscous royal
Overall, Couscous royal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
COUSCOUS 450g passage en 400g 3 250 392 947 200 24034281 3250392280956 19416519
Couscous royal
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | COUSCOUS 450g passage en 400... | Couscous royal |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 4 | — |
| Calories | 136 kcal | 130 kcal |
| Fat | 5.8 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 2 g | 1.2 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 2.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Protein | 7.9 g | 8.1 g |
| Additives | 3 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Couscous royal has 50% less fat (2.9 g vs 5.8 g).
- Couscous royal has 40% less saturated fat (1.2 g vs 2 g).
- Couscous royal has 38% less sugar (1.8 g vs 2.9 g).
- COUSCOUS 450g passage en 400g 3 250 392 947 200 24034281 3250392280956 19416519 has 18% more fiber (2.2 g vs 1.8 g).
- Only COUSCOUS 450g passage en 400g 3 250 392 947 200 24034281 3250392280956 19416519 lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
COUSCOUS 450g passage en 400g 3 250 392 947 200 24034281 3250392280956 19416519
Semoule de blé dur réhydratée 26,7% [eau, semoulede blé dur, raisins (raisins, huile de graines de coton), huile detournesol, sel, épice curcuma], viande de poulet rôtie 20% [viande de poulet(origine : France), eau, colorant : caramel ordinaire], eau, carottes 8%,merguez 7,7% [viande de bovin (origine : UE), eau, gras de bovin, épices(paprika, cumin, fenouil) et plante aromatique (ail), sel, dextrose, sirop deglucose, extrait de paprika, arômes naturels, piment fort], courgettes 7,5%, navets3,7%, poivrons rouges, pois chiches 3,5%, boulette de préparation de viandebovine hachée avec protéines de pois cuite 3,2% [viande bovine (origine :France), eau, protéines de pois réhydratées, chapelure (farine de blé,sel), sel, arôme naturel, épices], double concentré de tomates, oignons, farinede manioc, fond de volaille (viande et jus de cuisson de volaille (origine :UE), sel), sel, huile de tournesol, ail, mélange d'épices et de plantesaromatiques (piment, fenouil, ail, cumin, coriandre, piment fort), gélatine alimentairebovine, fond d'agneau [viande d'agneau (origine : UE/ Hors UE), jus de cuissonet graisse d'agneau, oignon, sel de mer], coriandre 0,08%, cumin, thym, épicesharissa 0,05% (piment, ail, coriandre, sel, carvi). Pourcentages exprimés sur le poids net total.
Couscous royal
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: COUSCOUS 450g passage en 400g 3 250 392 947 200 24034281 3250392280956 19416519 or Couscous royal?
Overall, Couscous royal has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Couscous royal has fewer calories: 130 kcal versus 136 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Couscous royal has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.