Couscous vs Mediterranean Inspired Couscous
Overall, Mediterranean Inspired Couscous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Couscous | Mediterranean Inspired Cousc... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | b |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 148 kcal | 144 kcal |
| Fat | 8.4 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.9 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 1.6 g | 2.3 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | 1 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 8.7 g | 5.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 4 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mediterranean Inspired Couscous has 82% less fat (1.5 g vs 8.4 g).
- Mediterranean Inspired Couscous has 85% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2.9 g).
- Couscous has 30% less sugar (1.6 g vs 2.3 g).
- Mediterranean Inspired Couscous has 60% more fiber (2.5 g vs 1 g).
- Couscous has 36% more protein (8.7 g vs 5.6 g).
- Mediterranean Inspired Couscous has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Mediterranean Inspired Couscous lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Couscous
Not available.
Mediterranean Inspired Couscous
Couscous (Durum Wheat Semolina), Tomato Powder, Dried Tomato, Flavourings (contain Barley), Palm Oil, Sugar, Dried Onion, Dried Black Olives [Black Olive, Salt, Acidity Regulator (Lactic Acid), Stabiliser (Ferrous Gluconate)], Salt, Dried Herbs, Dried Garlic, Colour (Paprika Extract), Citric Acid. V Suitable for vegetarians
FAQ
Which is healthier: Couscous or Mediterranean Inspired Couscous?
Overall, Mediterranean Inspired Couscous has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mediterranean Inspired Couscous has fewer calories: 144 kcal versus 148 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Couscous has less sugar: 1.6 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.