Comparison

Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille vs Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise

Overall, Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d'Alaska à l'oseilleColin d’Alaska à la bordelai...
Nutri-Score a c
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 79 kcal 126 kcal
Fat 2.7 g 7.7 g
Saturated fat 1.1 g 3.8 g
Sugars 1 g 0.9 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 11 g 10 g
Additives20
AllergensFish, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille has 37% fewer calories (79 kcal vs 126 kcal).
  • Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille has 65% less fat (2.7 g vs 7.7 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille has 71% less saturated fat (1.1 g vs 3.8 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille lists: Fish, Milk.

Ingredients

Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille

Colin d'Alaska (50%), eau, crème fraîche fluide légère (4,8%), oseille (4,7%), oignon (2,5%), poudre de lait entier, jus de citron, huile de tournesol, vin blanc, amidons transformés de mais, amidon transformé de manioc, sel, beurre, vinaigre d'alcool, épaississant : gomme xanthane, poivre noir moulu, paprika, curcuma.

Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille or Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise?

Overall, Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d'Alaska à l'oseille has fewer calories: 79 kcal versus 126 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d’Alaska à la bordelaise has less sugar: 0.9 g versus 1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons