Comparison

Colin d\'Alaska à la bordelaise et riz aux légumes vs Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise

Overall, Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d\'Alaska à la bordela...Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelai...
Nutri-Score c b
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 149 kcal 147 kcal
Fat 6.1 g 7.6 g
Saturated fat 3.5 g 1.7 g
Sugars 0.9 g 0.6 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.8 g
Fiber 0.6 g —
Protein 6 g 14 g
Additives00
AllergensFish, Gluten, MilkNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin d\'Alaska à la bordelaise et riz aux légumes has 20% less fat (6.1 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise has 51% less saturated fat (1.7 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise has 33% less sugar (0.6 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise has 57% more protein (14 g vs 6 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Colin d\'Alaska à la bordelaise et riz aux légumes lists: Fish, Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Colin d\'Alaska à la bordelaise et riz aux légumes

Riz basmati cuit 38% (eau, riz basmati, sel), filet de _colin_ d'Alaska MSC (_poisson_) qualité sans arête 25%, légumes 9% (courgette, tomate), _crème_ fraîche (_lait_), eau, échalote 3,4%, _beurre_ (_lait_), chapelure 2,6% [farine de _blé_ (_gluten_), sel, dextrose], vin blanc 2,4%, oignon, jus de citron jaune 1,8%, huile de tournesol, purée de tomate, fumet de _poissons_ [eau, _cabillaud_ (_poisson_), sel, huile de tournesol, vin blanc, fibres d'agrumes, oignon], ail, sel, persil 0,3%, fécule de pomme de terre, poivre, paprika (Colin pêché en Océan Pacifique N-O (FAO 61) ,/ou N-E (FAO 67)

Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d\'Alaska à la bordelaise et riz aux légumes or Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise?

Overall, Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise has fewer calories: 147 kcal versus 149 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d'Alaska a la Bordelaise has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons