Comparison

Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise 400g vs Colin d'alaska au naturel

Overall, Colin d'alaska au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d'Alaska à la Bordelai...Colin d'alaska au naturel
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 4 3
Calories 152 kcal 84 kcal
Fat 8.8 g 1 g
Saturated fat 2.6 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0.8 g 0.5 g
Salt 0.8 g 1.2 g
Fiber 0.6 g 0.1 g
Protein 11 g 19 g
Additives10
AllergensFish, Gluten, MilkFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin d'alaska au naturel has 45% fewer calories (84 kcal vs 152 kcal).
  • Colin d'alaska au naturel has 89% less fat (1 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Colin d'alaska au naturel has 88% less saturated fat (0.3 g vs 2.6 g).
  • Colin d'alaska au naturel has 38% less sugar (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise 400g has 33% less salt (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise 400g has 90% more fiber (0.6 g vs 0.1 g).
  • Colin d'alaska au naturel has 42% more protein (19 g vs 11 g).
  • Colin d'alaska au naturel has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Colin d'alaska au naturel is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise 400g lists: Gluten, Milk.

Ingredients

Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise 400g

Portions de bloc de filets de COLIN d'Alaska MSC (theragra chalcogramma, pêché en Pacifique Nord-Est ou Nord-Ouest) 60%, oignon 14%, chapelure 6% (farine de BLE, sel, levure, extraits d'épices), huile de colza, eau, BEURRE, CREME fraîche 1,5%, jus de citron à base de concentré 1,5% (eau, jus de citron concentré), ail, persil 0,6%, sel, denrée alimentaire colorante : concentré de carottes, amidon modifié de maïs. Traces éventuelles de crustacés, céleri, graines de sésame, mollusques, moutarde, oeuf et soja.

Colin d'alaska au naturel

Colin d'Alaska 76,3% (_Poisson_ - Theragra chalcogramma), eau, sel. Zone de pêche FAO : océan Pacifique Nord-Est.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d'Alaska à la Bordelaise 400g or Colin d'alaska au naturel?

Overall, Colin d'alaska au naturel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d'alaska au naturel has fewer calories: 84 kcal versus 152 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d'alaska au naturel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.8 g per 100 g.

More comparisons