Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g vs Tranches de colin d Alaska
Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g | Tranches de colin d Alaska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | 1 |
| Calories | 175 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 7.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 12.6 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 59% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 175 kcal).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 90% less fat (0.8 g vs 7.6 g).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 89% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has no sugar, while Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g has 1.1 g.
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 62% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.7 g).
- Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g has 100% more fiber (0.7 g vs 0 g).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 21% more protein (16 g vs 12.6 g).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g
Filets de Colin d'Alaska (poissons) (Theragra chalcogramma) issus de pêche durable 70%, chapelure 14,1% (farine de blé, levure, sel, extrait de malt d'orge, paprika, curcuma), huile de colza, farine de blé, amidon de pomme de terre, eau, sel, poivre. Traces éventuelles de sésame. **Bien qu'un soin tout particulier ait été pris pour enlever les arêtes, quelques-unes peuvent exceptionnellement se retrouver dans ce produit.
Tranches de colin d Alaska
100 % filets de colin d'Alaska (poissons).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin alaska pane msc 20x50g or Tranches de colin d Alaska?
Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tranches de colin d Alaska has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 175 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tranches de colin d Alaska has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.1 g per 100 g.