Comparison

Tranches de colin d Alaska vs Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel

Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTranches de colin d AlaskaFiletes de merluza del cabo...
Nutri-Score a a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 71 kcal 82 kcal
Fat 0.8 g 1.2 g
Saturated fat 0.1 g 0.3 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 0.3 g 0.2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 16 g 18 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Tranches de colin d Alaska has 13% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 82 kcal).
  • Tranches de colin d Alaska has 33% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
  • Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
  • Only Tranches de colin d Alaska lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Tranches de colin d Alaska

100 % filets de colin d'Alaska (poissons).

Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel

FILETES DE MERLUZA DEL CABO SIN PIEL

FAQ

Which is healthier: Tranches de colin d Alaska or Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel?

Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Tranches de colin d Alaska has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Tranches de colin d Alaska has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons