Tranches de colin d Alaska vs Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel
Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tranches de colin d Alaska
Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tranches de colin d Alaska | Filetes de merluza del cabo... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 82 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 1.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.3 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 16 g | 18 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 13% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 82 kcal).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 33% less fat (0.8 g vs 1.2 g).
- Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
- Only Tranches de colin d Alaska lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Tranches de colin d Alaska
100 % filets de colin d'Alaska (poissons).
Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel
FILETES DE MERLUZA DEL CABO SIN PIEL
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tranches de colin d Alaska or Filetes de merluza del cabo sin piel?
Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tranches de colin d Alaska has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 82 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tranches de colin d Alaska has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.