Tranches de colin d Alaska vs Schlemmerfilet Italiano mit Tomate Mozzarella
Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Tranches de colin d Alaska
Schlemmerfilet Italiano mit Tomate Mozzarella
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Tranches de colin d Alaska | Schlemmerfilet Italiano mit... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 71 kcal | 79 kcal |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 2.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.3 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 16 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Speisequarkzubereitung |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 10% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 79 kcal).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 68% less fat (0.8 g vs 2.5 g).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 90% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 1 g).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has no sugar, while Schlemmerfilet Italiano mit Tomate Mozzarella has 1.2 g.
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 73% less salt (0.3 g vs 0.9 g).
- Schlemmerfilet Italiano mit Tomate Mozzarella has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 31% more protein (16 g vs 11 g).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Schlemmerfilet Italiano mit Tomate Mozzarella lists: Gluten, Milk, Speisequarkzubereitung.
Ingredients
Tranches de colin d Alaska
100 % filets de colin d'Alaska (poissons).
Schlemmerfilet Italiano mit Tomate Mozzarella
Alaska Seelachs-Filet (52%), Tomaten (19%), Zwiebeln, Paprika (4,3%), Speisequarkzubereitung (Speisequark, Joghurt mild aus entrahmter Milch), Wasser, Edamer, Mozzarella (2,0%), Stärke, Rapsöl, Salz, Knoblauch, Basilikum, Kräuter, Joghurterzeugnis, Pfeffer, Zwiebelpulver, Paprikapulver, Zucker.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Tranches de colin d Alaska or Schlemmerfilet Italiano mit Tomate Mozzarella?
Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tranches de colin d Alaska has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 79 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Tranches de colin d Alaska has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.