Pavés de saumon rose du Pacifique vs Tranches de colin d Alaska
Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Pavés de saumon rose du Paci... | Tranches de colin d Alaska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 106 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 2 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.4 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 33% fewer calories (71 kcal vs 106 kcal).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 60% less fat (0.8 g vs 2 g).
- Tranches de colin d Alaska has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Pavés de saumon rose du Pacifique has 27% more protein (22 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Pavés de saumon rose du Pacifique
Pavés de saumon rose du Pacifique* (Oncorhynchus gorbuscha)
Tranches de colin d Alaska
100 % filets de colin d'Alaska (poissons).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Pavés de saumon rose du Pacifique or Tranches de colin d Alaska?
Overall, Tranches de colin d Alaska has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tranches de colin d Alaska has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 106 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Pavés de saumon rose du Pacifique has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.