Dos de cabillaud vs Tranches de colin d Alaska
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 1 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Dos de cabillaud | Tranches de colin d Alaska |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 77 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 0.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0.2 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 18 g | 16 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Dos de cabillaud has 11% more protein (18 g vs 16 g).
Ingredients
Dos de cabillaud
Cabillaud MSC (POISSONS) qualité sans arête*, Gadus morhua sauvage pêché aux filets maillants et filets similaires, sennes, chaluts, lignes et hameçons, en Atlantique Nord-Est (FAO 27), sous-zones Mer de Barents (1), Mers de Norvège (II). * Malgré tout le soin apporté à la préparation de nos poissons qualité sans arête, la présence exceptionnelle d'arête n'est jamais exclue.
Tranches de colin d Alaska
100 % filets de colin d'Alaska (poissons).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Dos de cabillaud or Tranches de colin d Alaska?
Overall, Dos de cabillaud has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Tranches de colin d Alaska has fewer calories: 71 kcal versus 77 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Dos de cabillaud has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.