Comparison

Colin à la provencale vs Colin d’alaska à la florentine

Overall, Colin à la provencale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin à la provencaleColin d’alaska à la florenti...
Nutri-Score a b
NOVA group — —
Calories 64 kcal 91 kcal
Fat 1.6 g 3.7 g
Saturated fat 0.2 g 2.5 g
Sugars 2.3 g 1.2 g
Salt 0.5 g 0.7 g
Fiber 0.9 g —
Protein 8.8 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin à la provencale has 30% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 91 kcal).
  • Colin à la provencale has 57% less fat (1.6 g vs 3.7 g).
  • Colin à la provencale has 92% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 48% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.3 g).
  • Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 20% more protein (11 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Colin à la provencale has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Colin à la provencale

Not available.

Colin d’alaska à la florentine

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin à la provencale or Colin d’alaska à la florentine?

Overall, Colin à la provencale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin à la provencale has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d’alaska à la florentine has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.

More comparisons