Colin à la provencale vs Colin d’alaska à la florentine
Overall, Colin à la provencale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Colin à la provencale
Colin d’alaska à la florentine
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin à la provencale | Colin d’alaska à la florenti... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 64 kcal | 91 kcal |
| Fat | 1.6 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 2.3 g | 1.2 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.7 g |
| Fiber | 0.9 g | — |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin à la provencale has 30% fewer calories (64 kcal vs 91 kcal).
- Colin à la provencale has 57% less fat (1.6 g vs 3.7 g).
- Colin à la provencale has 92% less saturated fat (0.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 48% less sugar (1.2 g vs 2.3 g).
- Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 20% more protein (11 g vs 8.8 g).
- Colin à la provencale has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Colin à la provencale
Not available.
Colin d’alaska à la florentine
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin à la provencale or Colin d’alaska à la florentine?
Overall, Colin à la provencale has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin à la provencale has fewer calories: 64 kcal versus 91 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d’alaska à la florentine has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 2.3 g per 100 g.