Colin d’alaska à la florentine vs Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux
Overall, Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Colin d’alaska à la florentine
Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d’alaska à la florenti... | Saumon rose du Pacifique sau... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 93 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 3.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.5 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux has 40% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 20% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
- Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Colin d’alaska à la florentine
Not available.
Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d’alaska à la florentine or Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux?
Overall, Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d’alaska à la florentine has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 93 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Colin d’alaska à la florentine has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.