Comparison

Colin d’alaska à la florentine vs Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux

Overall, Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d’alaska à la florenti...Saumon rose du Pacifique sau...
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group — —
Calories 91 kcal 93 kcal
Fat 3.7 g 3.7 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 1.5 g
Sugars 1.2 g 1.5 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.5 g
Protein 11 g 12 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux has 40% less saturated fat (1.5 g vs 2.5 g).
  • Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 20% less sugar (1.2 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Colin d’alaska à la florentine

Not available.

Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d’alaska à la florentine or Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux?

Overall, Saumon rose du Pacifique sauce aux Poireaux has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d’alaska à la florentine has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 93 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Colin d’alaska à la florentine has less sugar: 1.2 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons