Colin d’alaska à la florentine vs Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc
Overall, Colin d’alaska à la florentine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Colin d’alaska à la florenti... | Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | c |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 91 kcal | 124 kcal |
| Fat | 3.7 g | 7.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 2.5 g | 4.2 g |
| Sugars | 1.2 g | 1.1 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 11 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 27% fewer calories (91 kcal vs 124 kcal).
- Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 51% less fat (3.7 g vs 7.6 g).
- Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 40% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 4.2 g).
- Colin d’alaska à la florentine has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Colin d’alaska à la florentine
Not available.
Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Colin d’alaska à la florentine or Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc?
Overall, Colin d’alaska à la florentine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Colin d’alaska à la florentine has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 124 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.