Comparison

Colin d’alaska à la florentine vs Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc

Overall, Colin d’alaska à la florentine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientColin d’alaska à la florenti...Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc
Nutri-Score b c
NOVA group — —
Calories 91 kcal 124 kcal
Fat 3.7 g 7.6 g
Saturated fat 2.5 g 4.2 g
Sugars 1.2 g 1.1 g
Salt 0.7 g 0.5 g
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 11 g 11 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 27% fewer calories (91 kcal vs 124 kcal).
  • Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 51% less fat (3.7 g vs 7.6 g).
  • Colin d’alaska à la florentine has 40% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Colin d’alaska à la florentine has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Colin d’alaska à la florentine

Not available.

Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Colin d’alaska à la florentine or Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc?

Overall, Colin d’alaska à la florentine has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Colin d’alaska à la florentine has fewer calories: 91 kcal versus 124 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Saumon Rose Beurre Blanc has less sugar: 1.1 g versus 1.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons