Cinammon roll vs Gifflar Kanel
Overall, Gifflar Kanel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cinammon roll | Gifflar Kanel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 4 |
| Calories | 411 kcal | 373 kcal |
| Fat | 21.5 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 12.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 19.5 g | 19 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 2 g | — |
| Protein | 7.7 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 8 |
| Allergens | None listed | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Gifflar Kanel has 35% less fat (14 g vs 21.5 g).
- Gifflar Kanel has 79% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 12.1 g).
- Gifflar Kanel has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Gifflar Kanel lists: Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts.
Ingredients
Cinammon roll
Not available.
Gifflar Kanel
_Vetemjöl_, vatten, socker, rapsolja, farinsocker, vegetabiliskt fullhärdat fett (kokos, raps), aprikoskärnor, _mandel_, _skummjölk_, _ägg_, invertsocker, jäst, malt av _korn_, salt, modifierad stärkelse, bakpulver (E450, E500), vegetabiliskt emulgeringsmedel (E471), konserveringsmedel (E200, E282), förtjockningsmedel (E440), surhetsreglerande medel (E330), kanel (0,7%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cinammon roll or Gifflar Kanel?
Overall, Gifflar Kanel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Gifflar Kanel has fewer calories: 373 kcal versus 411 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gifflar Kanel has less sugar: 19 g versus 19.5 g per 100 g.