Cinammon buns vs Gifflar Kanel
Overall, Gifflar Kanel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cinammon buns | Gifflar Kanel |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 337 kcal | 373 kcal |
| Fat | 10.2 g | 14 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Sugars | 21.6 g | 19 g |
| Salt | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Fiber | 2.1 g | — |
| Protein | 6.6 g | 7.3 g |
| Additives | 11 | 8 |
| Allergens | Gluten | Eggs, Gluten, Milk, Nuts |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cinammon buns has 27% less fat (10.2 g vs 14 g).
- Gifflar Kanel has 43% less saturated fat (2.5 g vs 4.4 g).
- Gifflar Kanel has 12% less sugar (19 g vs 21.6 g).
- Only Gifflar Kanel lists: Eggs, Milk, Nuts.
Ingredients
Cinammon buns
L212 Best before 01:53 L1 2 sweet buns swirled with cinnamon and hand topped with a soft cheese icing. Ingredients Fortified wheat flour (wheat flour, calcium carbonate, iron, niacin, thiamin), Sugar, Water, Vegetable oils (palm, rapeseed), Colours (curcumin, annatto), Humectants (invert sugar syrup, glycerol, sorbitol syrup), Dark brown soft sugar, Full fat soft cheese ilk) (2%), Yeast, Egg Full cream milk powder, Dried. ce syrus Pa acia sifiers fatty acids), OTS (mono - and e and diacetyltartaric Cinnamon powder, Wheat flour, Stabiliser (guar gum), Lemon juice, Raising agents (diphosphates, sodium carbonates), Flavouring, Gelling agent (agar), Acidity regulator (citric acid), Flour treatment agent (ascorbic acid), Vitamin A. ALLERGY ADVICE For allergens, including cereals Containing gluten, see ingredients in bold. May also contain sova
Gifflar Kanel
_Vetemjöl_, vatten, socker, rapsolja, farinsocker, vegetabiliskt fullhärdat fett (kokos, raps), aprikoskärnor, _mandel_, _skummjölk_, _ägg_, invertsocker, jäst, malt av _korn_, salt, modifierad stärkelse, bakpulver (E450, E500), vegetabiliskt emulgeringsmedel (E471), konserveringsmedel (E200, E282), förtjockningsmedel (E440), surhetsreglerande medel (E330), kanel (0,7%).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cinammon buns or Gifflar Kanel?
Overall, Gifflar Kanel has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cinammon buns has fewer calories: 337 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Gifflar Kanel has less sugar: 19 g versus 21.6 g per 100 g.