Chow mein with dried seaweed laver vs Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe
Overall, Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chow mein with dried seaweed... | Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | 4 | 4 |
| Calories | 500 kcal | 173 kcal |
| Fat | 24.5 g | 13 g |
| Saturated fat | 11.8 g | 4.7 g |
| Sugars | 3.9 g | 2.9 g |
| Salt | 4.7 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 2.9 g | — |
| Protein | 8.8 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 14 | 0 |
| Allergens | Gluten, Soybeans, Sulphur dioxide and sulphites | Gluten, Milk, Soybeans |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has 65% fewer calories (173 kcal vs 500 kcal).
- Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has 47% less fat (13 g vs 24.5 g).
- Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has 60% less saturated fat (4.7 g vs 11.8 g).
- Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has 26% less sugar (2.9 g vs 3.9 g).
- Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has 76% less salt (1.1 g vs 4.7 g).
- Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has 12% more protein (10 g vs 8.8 g).
- Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Chow mein with dried seaweed laver lists: Sulphur dioxide and sulphites.
- Only Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe lists: Milk.
Ingredients
Chow mein with dried seaweed laver
Oriental noodles: enriched wheat flour (wheat flour, niacin, reduced iron, thiamine mononitrate, riboflavin, folic acid), palm oil (tbhq and citric acid added to protect flavor), salt, sodium carbonate, sugar, monosodium glutamate, tocopherols, potassium carbonate. powdered seasoning: sugar, salt, caramel color (contains sulfites), monosodium glutamate, worcestershire sauce powder ([distilled vinegar, molasses, corn syrup, salt, caramel color, garlic powder, sugar, spices, tamarind, natural flavor and sulfiting agents], maltodextrin, silicon dioxide), vinegar powder (modified corn starch, maltodextrin, vinegar solids), maltodextrin, soy sauce powder (soy sauce [water, wheat, soybeans, salt], maltodextrin, salt), sodium diacetate, citric acid, tomato powder, spices, calcium carbonate, corn oil, corn starch, annatto (for color), disodium inosinate, disodium guanylate, disodium succinate, artificial flavor. dried seaweed: laver.
Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe
Fleischknochenbrühe (Wasser, Schweineknochen und - fleisch 22 %, Hühnerknochen und - fleisch 7,4 %, Zwiebeln, Ingwer, Knoblauch), Tonkotsu Tare Gewürzpaste 10 % (Wasser, Speisesalz, entfettete _Sojabohnen_, _Weizen_, Fruktose-Glukose-Sirup, Reis, _Sojabohnen_, Glukosesirup, Seetangextrakt (Seetang, Speisesalz), getrockneter Seetang, fermentierte Würze (Reis-Koji, Speisesalz), Hefeextrakt, Essig, Zucker, Reis-Koji, Pilzextrakt), _Milch_.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chow mein with dried seaweed laver or Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe?
Overall, Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has fewer calories: 173 kcal versus 500 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Ramen Tonkotsu Schweinebrühe has less sugar: 2.9 g versus 3.9 g per 100 g.