Comparison
Chou plat (blanc cabus) vs Spitskool
Overall, Chou plat (blanc cabus) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chou plat (blanc cabus) | Spitskool |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 37 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0.6 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.3 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 4.2 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.5 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 1.4 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chou plat (blanc cabus) has 13% fewer calories (37 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Chou plat (blanc cabus) has 40% less fat (0.6 g vs 1 g).
- Chou plat (blanc cabus) has 29% more fiber (3.5 g vs 2.5 g).
- Spitskool has 54% more protein (3 g vs 1.4 g).
Ingredients
Chou plat (blanc cabus)
Chou blanc
Spitskool
Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chou plat (blanc cabus) or Spitskool?
Overall, Chou plat (blanc cabus) has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chou plat (blanc cabus) has fewer calories: 37 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Spitskool has less sugar: 4 g versus 4.2 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Chou blanc lacto-ferment... vs Chou plat (blanc cabus)
Chou blanc lacto-ferment... vs Spitskool
Mélange crudités vs Chou plat (blanc cabus)
Mélange crudités vs Spitskool
Duo de choux 400g vs Chou plat (blanc cabus)
Chou blanc fermenté 400g... vs Spitskool
Duo de choux 400g vs Spitskool
Duo de choux 400g - Stoe... vs Chou plat (blanc cabus)