Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio vs Spitskool
Overall, Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bi... | Spitskool |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 11 kcal | 42 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.3 g | 4 g |
| Salt | 0.7 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.4 g | 2.5 g |
| Protein | 0.4 g | 3 g |
| Additives | 1 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has 74% fewer calories (11 kcal vs 42 kcal).
- Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has no fat, while Spitskool has 1 g.
- Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has no saturated fat, while Spitskool has 0.4 g.
- Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has 93% less sugar (0.3 g vs 4 g).
- Spitskool has no salt, while Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has 0.7 g.
- Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has 26% more fiber (3.4 g vs 2.5 g).
- Spitskool has 87% more protein (3 g vs 0.4 g).
Ingredients
Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio
Choucroute (choux*. France, sel marin). Jus : eau, sel marin, antioxydant : acide ascorbique 0,03%. * Ingrédients issus de l'Agriculture Biologique
Spitskool
Waarvan toegevoegde suikers 0.00g per 100 gram
FAQ
Which is healthier: Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio or Spitskool?
Overall, Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has fewer calories: 11 kcal versus 42 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Chou blanc lacto-fermenté bio has less sugar: 0.3 g versus 4 g per 100 g.