Cassava flour vs Farofa de mandioca
Overall, Cassava flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 9 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassava flour | Farofa de mandioca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | d |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 344 kcal | 397 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 12 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 2.4 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 2.4 g |
| Fiber | 9.4 g | 5.1 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 2 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassava flour has 13% fewer calories (344 kcal vs 397 kcal).
- Cassava flour has no fat, while Farofa de mandioca has 12 g.
- Cassava flour has no saturated fat, while Farofa de mandioca has 2.4 g.
- Cassava flour has no salt, while Farofa de mandioca has 2.4 g.
- Cassava flour has 46% more fiber (9.4 g vs 5.1 g).
- Cassava flour has 36% more protein (3.1 g vs 2 g).
- Cassava flour has the better Nutri-Score.
- Cassava flour is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Cassava flour
Cassava (yuca root)
Farofa de mandioca
Farinha de mandioca, óleo vegetal, calabresa, sal, cebola, alho, salsa cominho, pimenta calabresa, pimenta do reino, realçador de sabor glutamato monossódico (INS 621), condimento preparado de linguiça tipo calabresa e antioxidante BHT (INS 321).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassava flour or Farofa de mandioca?
Overall, Cassava flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassava flour has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 397 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassava flour has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.