Cassava flour vs Farinha de Mandioca
Overall, Cassava flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Cassava flour | Farinha de Mandioca |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | 1 |
| Calories | 344 kcal | 347 kcal |
| Fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 9.4 g | 6.4 g |
| Protein | 3.1 g | 1.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Cassava flour has no sugar, while Farinha de Mandioca has 1.3 g.
- Cassava flour has 32% more fiber (9.4 g vs 6.4 g).
- Cassava flour has 49% more protein (3.1 g vs 1.6 g).
Ingredients
Cassava flour
Cassava (yuca root)
Farinha de Mandioca
Farinha de mandioca.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Cassava flour or Farinha de Mandioca?
Overall, Cassava flour has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Cassava flour has fewer calories: 344 kcal versus 347 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Cassava flour has less sugar: 0 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.