Comparison

Cashew Cookie Fruit & Nut Bar vs Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup

Overall, Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientCashew Cookie Fruit & Nut Ba...Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup
Nutri-Score — —
NOVA group 3 4
Calories 444 kcal 452 kcal
Fat 23.4 g 17.9 g
Saturated fat 4.6 g 2.1 g
Sugars 39.2 g 26.9 g
Salt 0 g 0.8 g
Fiber 4.7 g 6.4 g
Protein 10 g 8.6 g
Additives04
AllergensNutsNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup has 24% less fat (17.9 g vs 23.4 g).
  • Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup has 53% less saturated fat (2.1 g vs 4.6 g).
  • Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup has 31% less sugar (26.9 g vs 39.2 g).
  • Cashew Cookie Fruit & Nut Bar has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup has 27% more fiber (6.4 g vs 4.7 g).
  • Cashew Cookie Fruit & Nut Bar has 14% more protein (10 g vs 8.6 g).
  • Cashew Cookie Fruit & Nut Bar is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Cashew Cookie Fruit & Nut Bar lists: Nuts.

Ingredients

Cashew Cookie Fruit & Nut Bar

cashews 51%, dates 49%.

Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup

whole oat flakes (60%), sugar, refined sunflower oil, canada maple syrup (2%), honey, natural aroma, salt, emulsifier (sunflower lecithin), gasifier (sodium acid carbonate), cane molasses,

FAQ

Which is healthier: Cashew Cookie Fruit & Nut Bar or Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup?

Overall, Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Cashew Cookie Fruit & Nut Bar has fewer calories: 444 kcal versus 452 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Crunchy Canadian Maple Syrup has less sugar: 26.9 g versus 39.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons