Calamares rellenos en salsa americana vs Calamar
Overall, Calamar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Calamares rellenos en salsa... | Calamar |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 172 kcal | 62 kcal |
| Fat | 9.5 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Fiber | 1.5 g | — |
| Protein | 14 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Molluscs | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Calamar has 64% fewer calories (62 kcal vs 172 kcal).
- Calamar has 84% less fat (1.5 g vs 9.5 g).
- Calamar has 38% less saturated fat (0.8 g vs 1.3 g).
- Calamar has 59% less salt (0.4 g vs 1.1 g).
- Calamares rellenos en salsa americana has 14% more protein (14 g vs 12 g).
- Calamar has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Calamares rellenos en salsa americana lists: Molluscs.
Ingredients
Calamares rellenos en salsa americana
Calamares (moluscos) (64%) (Loligo spp, Dosidicus spp), aceite de girasol, cebolla, arroz, tomate, especias y sal.
Calamar
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Calamares rellenos en salsa americana or Calamar?
Overall, Calamar has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Calamar has fewer calories: 62 kcal versus 172 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Calamares rellenos en salsa americana has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.