Brotes de rúcula vs Tomate Frito
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 10 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brotes de rúcula | Tomate Frito |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | c |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 30 kcal | 71 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 3.4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.4 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 5.8 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 1.1 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 0.4 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 1.4 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Brotes de rúcula has 58% fewer calories (30 kcal vs 71 kcal).
- Brotes de rúcula has 85% less fat (0.5 g vs 3.4 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 75% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.4 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 90% less sugar (0.6 g vs 5.8 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 97% less salt (0 g vs 1.1 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 73% more fiber (1.4 g vs 0.4 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 58% more protein (3.3 g vs 1.4 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has the better Nutri-Score.
- Brotes de rúcula is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Brotes de rúcula
Rúcula.
Tomate Frito
Tomate (25%), aceite de girasol, azúcar, almidón de maíz modificado, sal y mezcla de especias. EN Ingredients: Tomato (25%), sunflower oil, sugar, modified corn starch, salt and a mixed spices. FR Ingrédients: Tomate (25%), huile de tournesol, sucre, amidon de maïs modifié, sel et mélange d'épices.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brotes de rúcula or Tomate Frito?
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Brotes de rúcula has fewer calories: 30 kcal versus 71 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brotes de rúcula has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 5.8 g per 100 g.