Comparison
Brotes de rúcula vs Apio rallado
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Brotes de rúcula | Apio rallado |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | 3 |
| Calories | 30 kcal | 18 kcal |
| Fat | 0.5 g | 0.3 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 0.6 g | 0.6 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0.9 g |
| Fiber | 1.4 g | 2.4 g |
| Protein | 3.3 g | 0.6 g |
| Additives | 0 | 2 |
| Allergens | None listed | Celery |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Apio rallado has 40% fewer calories (18 kcal vs 30 kcal).
- Brotes de rúcula has 97% less salt (0 g vs 0.9 g).
- Apio rallado has 42% more fiber (2.4 g vs 1.4 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has 82% more protein (3.3 g vs 0.6 g).
- Brotes de rúcula has the better Nutri-Score.
- Brotes de rúcula is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Apio rallado lists: Celery.
Ingredients
Brotes de rúcula
Rúcula.
Apio rallado
CELERIAC, water, spirit vinegar, salt, antioxidant: ascorbic acid (or E300), acid: citric acid (or E300)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Brotes de rúcula or Apio rallado?
Overall, Brotes de rúcula has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Apio rallado has fewer calories: 18 kcal versus 30 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Brotes de rúcula has less sugar: 0.6 g versus 0.6 g per 100 g.
More comparisons
Aceitunas partidas aliña... vs Apio rallado
Brotes de rúcula vs Aceitunas partidas aliña...
Bio maíz vs Apio rallado
Brotes de rúcula vs Bio maíz
Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3 vs Apio rallado
Brotes de rúcula vs Sweet corn SRP 1/4 212x3
Un toque de guisantes vs Apio rallado
Apio rallado vs Judías verdes extrafinas