Comparison
Braunhirse vs Kölesliszt
Overall, Kölesliszt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Braunhirse | Kölesliszt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 308 kcal | 361 kcal |
| Fat | 4.5 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 9.9 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Braunhirse has 15% fewer calories (308 kcal vs 361 kcal).
- Kölesliszt has 36% less fat (2.9 g vs 4.5 g).
- Kölesliszt has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
Ingredients
Braunhirse
100% Braunhirse, gemahlen.
Kölesliszt
100 % Hántolt köles
FAQ
Which is healthier: Braunhirse or Kölesliszt?
Overall, Kölesliszt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Braunhirse has fewer calories: 308 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kölesliszt has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.