Comparison
Farine de mil vs Kölesliszt
Overall, Kölesliszt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Farine de mil | Kölesliszt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 373 kcal | 361 kcal |
| Fat | 3.8 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.2 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 2.5 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 8 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kölesliszt has 24% less fat (2.9 g vs 3.8 g).
- Farine de mil has 60% less sugar (0.2 g vs 0.5 g).
- Kölesliszt has 22% more fiber (3.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Kölesliszt has 27% more protein (11 g vs 8 g).
Ingredients
Farine de mil
Millet
Kölesliszt
100 % Hántolt köles
FAQ
Which is healthier: Farine de mil or Kölesliszt?
Overall, Kölesliszt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Kölesliszt has fewer calories: 361 kcal versus 373 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Farine de mil has less sugar: 0.2 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.