Comparison
Kölesliszt vs Farine de millet brun
Overall, Farine de millet brun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Kölesliszt | Farine de millet brun |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | b |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 361 kcal | 350 kcal |
| Fat | 2.9 g | 4 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.6 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 0 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | 3.2 g | — |
| Protein | 11 g | 10 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kölesliszt has 28% less fat (2.9 g vs 4 g).
- Farine de millet brun has no saturated fat, while Kölesliszt has 0.6 g.
- Farine de millet brun has no sugar, while Kölesliszt has 0.5 g.
Ingredients
Kölesliszt
100 % Hántolt köles
Farine de millet brun
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Kölesliszt or Farine de millet brun?
Overall, Farine de millet brun has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Farine de millet brun has fewer calories: 350 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Farine de millet brun has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.