Comparison
Organic Millet Flour vs Kölesliszt
Overall, Kölesliszt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 2 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Organic Millet Flour | Kölesliszt |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | — | b |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 343 kcal | 361 kcal |
| Fat | 4.3 g | 2.9 g |
| Saturated fat | — | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 2.9 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | — | 0 g |
| Fiber | 8.6 g | 3.2 g |
| Protein | 11.4 g | 11 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Kölesliszt has 32% less fat (2.9 g vs 4.3 g).
- Kölesliszt has 83% less sugar (0.5 g vs 2.9 g).
- Organic Millet Flour has 63% more fiber (8.6 g vs 3.2 g).
Ingredients
Organic Millet Flour
ORGANIC WHOLE GRAIN MILLET FLOUR
Kölesliszt
100 % Hántolt köles
FAQ
Which is healthier: Organic Millet Flour or Kölesliszt?
Overall, Kölesliszt has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Organic Millet Flour has fewer calories: 343 kcal versus 361 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Kölesliszt has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 2.9 g per 100 g.