Comparison

Box California avocado vs Bento Sushi

Overall, Bento Sushi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBox California avocadoBento Sushi
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 4 —
Calories 186 kcal 120 kcal
Fat 6.4 g 3.7 g
Saturated fat 1 g 1 g
Sugars 5.2 g 4.1 g
Salt 1.8 g 2 g
Fiber 0 g —
Protein 6 g 7.5 g
Additives50
AllergensEggs, Fish, Gluten, Mustard, Sesame seeds, SoybeansNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bento Sushi has 35% fewer calories (120 kcal vs 186 kcal).
  • Bento Sushi has 42% less fat (3.7 g vs 6.4 g).
  • Bento Sushi has 21% less sugar (4.1 g vs 5.2 g).
  • Bento Sushi has 20% more protein (7.5 g vs 6 g).
  • Only Box California avocado lists: Eggs, Fish, Gluten, Mustard, Sesame seeds, Soybeans.

Ingredients

Box California avocado

Sushi : 68,8% riz préparé (eau, riz, sucre, vinaigre d'alcool, sel, huile de tournesol, vinaigre de riz, correcteur d'acidité : acétates de sodium), 10,8% pulpe d'avocat (10,3% avocat, sel, antioxydant : acide ascorbique, épaississant : gomme xanthane, acidifiant : acide citrique), 5,6% saumon cru (POISSON), 5,5% thon cuit (thon (POISSON), sel, eau), nori (algue séchée), GRAINES DE SESAME, ciboulette, mayonnaise (huile de colza, jaune d'OEUF, eau, vinaigre d'alcool, graines de MOUTARDE, sucre, sel, épices). Accompagnement : sauce SOJA [eau, graines de SOJA, BLE, sel, alcool (éthanol)]

Bento Sushi

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Box California avocado or Bento Sushi?

Overall, Bento Sushi has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bento Sushi has fewer calories: 120 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Bento Sushi has less sugar: 4.1 g versus 5.2 g per 100 g.

More comparisons