Bonito del norte vs Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva
Overall, Bonito del norte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 5 of our comparison points versus 0.
Bonito del norte
Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Bonito del norte | Migas de bonito del norte en... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | a | b |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 206 kcal | 192 kcal |
| Fat | 10.4 g | 10 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.9 g | 1.6 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 0.9 g | 1.3 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 28.1 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Bonito del norte has no sugar, while Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has 0.5 g.
- Bonito del norte has 27% less salt (0.9 g vs 1.3 g).
- Bonito del norte has 11% more protein (28.1 g vs 25 g).
- Bonito del norte has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Bonito del norte
Bonito del Norte, aceite de oliva, sal
Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva
Bonito del Norte (Atún Blanco - Thunnus alalunga) aceite de oliva y sal.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Bonito del norte or Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva?
Overall, Bonito del norte has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Migas de bonito del norte en aceite de oliva has fewer calories: 192 kcal versus 206 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Bonito del norte has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.