Comparison

Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets vs Filet de Sébaste

Overall, Filet de Sébaste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBoneless Butterflied Sardine...Filet de Sébaste
Nutri-Score b a
NOVA group 1 —
Calories 167 kcal 89 kcal
Fat 8.8 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 1.3 g 0.5 g
Sugars 0 g 0 g
Salt 1 g 0.2 g
Fiber 1.3 g —
Protein 20 g 18.8 g
Additives00
AllergensFishNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de Sébaste has 47% fewer calories (89 kcal vs 167 kcal).
  • Filet de Sébaste has 83% less fat (1.5 g vs 8.8 g).
  • Filet de Sébaste has 60% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
  • Filet de Sébaste has 81% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
  • Filet de Sébaste has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets lists: Fish.

Ingredients

Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets

HERRING, SPRING WATER CONTAINS: HERRING

Filet de Sébaste

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets or Filet de Sébaste?

Overall, Filet de Sébaste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de Sébaste has fewer calories: 89 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.

More comparisons