Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets vs Filet de Sébaste
Overall, Filet de Sébaste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Boneless Butterflied Sardine... | Filet de Sébaste |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | a |
| NOVA group | 1 | — |
| Calories | 167 kcal | 89 kcal |
| Fat | 8.8 g | 1.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 1 g | 0.2 g |
| Fiber | 1.3 g | — |
| Protein | 20 g | 18.8 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de Sébaste has 47% fewer calories (89 kcal vs 167 kcal).
- Filet de Sébaste has 83% less fat (1.5 g vs 8.8 g).
- Filet de Sébaste has 60% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Filet de Sébaste has 81% less salt (0.2 g vs 1 g).
- Filet de Sébaste has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets lists: Fish.
Ingredients
Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets
HERRING, SPRING WATER CONTAINS: HERRING
Filet de Sébaste
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets or Filet de Sébaste?
Overall, Filet de Sébaste has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de Sébaste has fewer calories: 89 kcal versus 167 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Boneless Butterflied Sardine Fillets has less sugar: 0 g versus 0 g per 100 g.