Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel vs Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min
Overall, Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel
Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMU... | Blé précuit cuisson rapide 1... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 359 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 3.1 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.6 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 7.5 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 13 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has 48% fewer calories (186 kcal vs 359 kcal).
- Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has 19% less fat (2.5 g vs 3.1 g).
- Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min has 52% more protein (13 g vs 6.2 g).
- Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel
Not available.
Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min
Blé dur précuit.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel or Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min?
Overall, Blé précuit cuisson rapide 10 min has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 359 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.