Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel vs Son de blé bio
Overall, Son de blé bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel
Son de blé bio
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMU... | Son de blé bio |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | c | a |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 186 kcal | 197 kcal |
| Fat | 2.5 g | 4.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.5 g | 0.8 g |
| Sugars | 0.5 g | 1.3 g |
| Salt | 0.8 g | 0 g |
| Fiber | — | 40 g |
| Protein | 6.2 g | 12 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | Gluten |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has 44% less fat (2.5 g vs 4.5 g).
- Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has 38% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 0.8 g).
- Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has 62% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1.3 g).
- Son de blé bio has 99% less salt (0 g vs 0.8 g).
- Son de blé bio has 48% more protein (12 g vs 6.2 g).
- Son de blé bio has the better Nutri-Score.
- Only Son de blé bio lists: Gluten.
Ingredients
Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel
Not available.
Son de blé bio
Son de blé issu de l'agriculture biologique. Traces d'oeufs.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel or Son de blé bio?
Overall, Son de blé bio has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has fewer calories: 186 kcal versus 197 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Blé, Epeautre, khorasan KAMUT au naturel has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1.3 g per 100 g.