Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham vs Sliced Honey Maple Ham
Overall, Sliced Honey Maple Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 3.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Black Forest Beechwood Smoke... | Sliced Honey Maple Ham |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | d |
| NOVA group | — | 1 |
| Calories | 107 kcal | 190 kcal |
| Fat | 2.7 g | 3.2 g |
| Saturated fat | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Sugars | 3.6 g | 5.3 g |
| Salt | — | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 0 g | — |
| Protein | 17.9 g | 31 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 44% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 190 kcal).
- Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 15% less fat (2.7 g vs 3.2 g).
- Sliced Honey Maple Ham has no saturated fat, while Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 0.9 g.
- Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 33% less sugar (3.6 g vs 5.3 g).
- Sliced Honey Maple Ham has 42% more protein (31 g vs 17.9 g).
- Sliced Honey Maple Ham has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham
Not available.
Sliced Honey Maple Ham
Ham
FAQ
Which is healthier: Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham or Sliced Honey Maple Ham?
Overall, Sliced Honey Maple Ham has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has less sugar: 3.6 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.