Turkey cotto salami vs Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham
Overall, Turkey cotto salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Turkey cotto salami | Black Forest Beechwood Smoke... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | b | e |
| NOVA group | — | — |
| Calories | 50 kcal | 107 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 2.7 g |
| Saturated fat | 1 g | 0.9 g |
| Sugars | 0 g | 3.6 g |
| Salt | 0.6 g | — |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 4 g | 17.9 g |
| Additives | 0 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Turkey cotto salami has 53% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 107 kcal).
- Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 23% less fat (2.7 g vs 3.5 g).
- Turkey cotto salami has no sugar, while Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 3.6 g.
- Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 78% more protein (17.9 g vs 4 g).
- Turkey cotto salami has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Turkey cotto salami
Not available.
Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Turkey cotto salami or Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham?
Overall, Turkey cotto salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Turkey cotto salami has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 107 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Turkey cotto salami has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.