Comparison

Turkey cotto salami vs Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham

Overall, Turkey cotto salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientTurkey cotto salamiBlack Forest Beechwood Smoke...
Nutri-Score b e
NOVA group — —
Calories 50 kcal 107 kcal
Fat 3.5 g 2.7 g
Saturated fat 1 g 0.9 g
Sugars 0 g 3.6 g
Salt 0.6 g —
Fiber — 0 g
Protein 4 g 17.9 g
Additives00
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Turkey cotto salami has 53% fewer calories (50 kcal vs 107 kcal).
  • Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 23% less fat (2.7 g vs 3.5 g).
  • Turkey cotto salami has no sugar, while Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 3.6 g.
  • Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham has 78% more protein (17.9 g vs 4 g).
  • Turkey cotto salami has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Turkey cotto salami

Not available.

Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Turkey cotto salami or Black Forest Beechwood Smoked Ham?

Overall, Turkey cotto salami has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Turkey cotto salami has fewer calories: 50 kcal versus 107 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Turkey cotto salami has less sugar: 0 g versus 3.6 g per 100 g.

More comparisons