Sliced Honey Maple Ham vs Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast
Overall, Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 2.
Sliced Honey Maple Ham
Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Sliced Honey Maple Ham | Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breas... |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | — |
| NOVA group | 1 | 4 |
| Calories | 190 kcal | 107 kcal |
| Fat | 3.2 g | 1.8 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | — |
| Sugars | 5.3 g | 1.8 g |
| Salt | 2.5 g | 1.9 g |
| Protein | 31 g | 16.1 g |
| Additives | 0 | 1 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast has 44% fewer calories (107 kcal vs 190 kcal).
- Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast has 44% less fat (1.8 g vs 3.2 g).
- Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast has 66% less sugar (1.8 g vs 5.3 g).
- Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast has 25% less salt (1.9 g vs 2.5 g).
- Sliced Honey Maple Ham has 48% more protein (31 g vs 16.1 g).
- Sliced Honey Maple Ham is less processed (lower NOVA group).
Ingredients
Sliced Honey Maple Ham
Ham
Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast
TURKEY BREAST, TURKEY BROTH, MODIFIED FOOD STARCH, CONTAINS 2% OR LESS OF THE FOLLOWING: DEXTROSE, SALT*, DRY VINEGAR, NATURAL FLAVORS, POTASSIUM CHLORIDE, SODIUM PHOSPHATE, CARRAGEENAN., COATED WITH BLACK PEPPER, SALT, PAPRIKA, WHITE PEPPER, MESQUITE SMOKE FLAVOR, MALTODEXTRIN, RED PEPPER.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Sliced Honey Maple Ham or Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast?
Overall, Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast has fewer calories: 107 kcal versus 190 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Mesquite Smoked Turkey Breast has less sugar: 1.8 g versus 5.3 g per 100 g.