Comparison

Bilash Balti Curry Saucr vs King Prawn Bhuna

Overall, Bilash Balti Curry Saucr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 3 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBilash Balti Curry SaucrKing Prawn Bhuna
Nutri-Score c —
NOVA group — 4
Calories 104 kcal 151 kcal
Fat 5.1 g 11 g
Saturated fat 0.4 g 2.2 g
Sugars 9 g 4.4 g
Salt 1.2 g —
Fiber 1.5 g —
Protein 1.1 g —
Additives01
AllergensNone listedCrustaceans, Milk

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Bilash Balti Curry Saucr has 31% fewer calories (104 kcal vs 151 kcal).
  • Bilash Balti Curry Saucr has 53% less fat (5.1 g vs 11 g).
  • Bilash Balti Curry Saucr has 82% less saturated fat (0.4 g vs 2.2 g).
  • King Prawn Bhuna has 51% less sugar (4.4 g vs 9 g).
  • Only King Prawn Bhuna lists: Crustaceans, Milk.

Ingredients

Bilash Balti Curry Saucr

Not available.

King Prawn Bhuna

Cooked King Prawns (25%) [King Prawns (Penaeus vannamei) (Crustacean) (88%), Water, Salt], Onions, Onion Purée, Tomatoes, Peppers (10%) [Green Peppers, Red Peppers], Rapeseed Oil, Half Cream (Milk) (6%), Tomato Paste, Ginger Purée, Garlic Purée, Unsalted Butter (Milk), Coriander, Green Chilli Purée, Salt, Roasted Red Chillies, Cane Sugar, Paprika Powder, Coriander Powder, Cumin Powder, Cornflour, Cumin Seeds, Colour (Paprika Extract), Turmeric, Fennel Seeds, Coriander Seeds, Chilli Powder, Cinnamon Powder, Clove Powder, White Pepper, Bay Leaf Powder.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Bilash Balti Curry Saucr or King Prawn Bhuna?

Overall, Bilash Balti Curry Saucr has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Bilash Balti Curry Saucr has fewer calories: 104 kcal versus 151 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

King Prawn Bhuna has less sugar: 4.4 g versus 9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons