Comparison

Beef goulash vs Soupe goulasch

Overall, Soupe goulasch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 2.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBeef goulashSoupe goulasch
Nutri-Score d c
NOVA group 4 4
Calories 119 kcal 67 kcal
Fat 6.6 g 1.5 g
Saturated fat 3.1 g 0.5 g
Sugars 1.5 g 1.5 g
Salt 1.4 g 1.1 g
Fiber 1.3 g 0.8 g
Protein 11 g 6 g
Additives12
AllergensGlutenCelery, Gluten

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Soupe goulasch has 44% fewer calories (67 kcal vs 119 kcal).
  • Soupe goulasch has 77% less fat (1.5 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Soupe goulasch has 84% less saturated fat (0.5 g vs 3.1 g).
  • Soupe goulasch has 23% less salt (1.1 g vs 1.4 g).
  • Beef goulash has 39% more fiber (1.3 g vs 0.8 g).
  • Beef goulash has 46% more protein (11 g vs 6 g).
  • Soupe goulasch has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Only Soupe goulasch lists: Celery.

Ingredients

Beef goulash

Water, cooked beef, reconstituted tomato (water, tomato paste), beef tallow, wheat flour, salt, paprika, onion, spices, garlic, sugar, vinegar, monosodium glutamate.

Soupe goulasch

eau, viande de beuf 22% (Suisse), pommes de terre, 18% ognions, poivrons, concentré de tomates, huile de cola, amidon de maïs modifié, bouillon de légumes, farine de blé, épices, sel de cuisine, extraits d'épices, bouillon de boeuf (avec jus de citron concentré, extrait de vin), sucre, colorant: extrait de paprika, arôme naturel (contient céleri), épaississant: gomme xanthane.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Beef goulash or Soupe goulasch?

Overall, Soupe goulasch has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Soupe goulasch has fewer calories: 67 kcal versus 119 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Soupe goulasch has less sugar: 1.5 g versus 1.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons