Comparison

Battered Haddock Fillet Portions vs Haddock fillets

Overall, Haddock fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 8 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBattered Haddock Fillet Port...Haddock fillets
Nutri-Score c a
NOVA group 4 1
Calories 185 kcal 109 kcal
Fat 6.6 g 0.5 g
Saturated fat 0.6 g 0.1 g
Sugars 0.5 g 0.5 g
Salt 1.5 g 0.3 g
Fiber 1.6 g 0.6 g
Protein 11.5 g 25 g
Additives70
AllergensFish, Gluten, MustardFish

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Haddock fillets has 41% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 185 kcal).
  • Haddock fillets has 92% less fat (0.5 g vs 6.6 g).
  • Haddock fillets has 84% less saturated fat (0.1 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Haddock fillets has 84% less salt (0.3 g vs 1.5 g).
  • Battered Haddock Fillet Portions has 62% more fiber (1.6 g vs 0.6 g).
  • Haddock fillets has 54% more protein (25 g vs 11.5 g).
  • Haddock fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
  • Haddock fillets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
  • Only Battered Haddock Fillet Portions lists: Gluten, Mustard.

Ingredients

Battered Haddock Fillet Portions

Haddock (Fish) (52%), Wheat Flour, Water, Rapeseed Oil, Wheat Starch, Salt, Maize Flour, Raising Agents (Disodium Diphosphate, Sodium Bicarbonate, Ammonium Carbonate), Palm Oil, Dextrose, Colour (Paprika Extract), Mustard Powder, Yeast Extract, Flavouring, Sunflower Oil, Yeast.

Haddock fillets

Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus).

FAQ

Which is healthier: Battered Haddock Fillet Portions or Haddock fillets?

Overall, Haddock fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Haddock fillets has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 185 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Battered Haddock Fillet Portions has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 0.5 g per 100 g.

More comparisons