Levure chimique vs Haddock fillets
Overall, Haddock fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Levure chimique | Haddock fillets |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | e | a |
| NOVA group | 4 | 1 |
| Calories | 171 kcal | 109 kcal |
| Fat | 0.3 g | 0.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 0 g | 0.1 g |
| Sugars | 1 g | 0.5 g |
| Salt | 5 g | 0.3 g |
| Fiber | 2.7 g | 0.6 g |
| Protein | 0.5 g | 25 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | Fish, Gluten, Milk, Mustard | Fish |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Haddock fillets has 36% fewer calories (109 kcal vs 171 kcal).
- Haddock fillets has 50% less sugar (0.5 g vs 1 g).
- Haddock fillets has 95% less salt (0.3 g vs 5 g).
- Levure chimique has 78% more fiber (2.7 g vs 0.6 g).
- Haddock fillets has 98% more protein (25 g vs 0.5 g).
- Haddock fillets has the better Nutri-Score.
- Haddock fillets is less processed (lower NOVA group).
- Only Levure chimique lists: Gluten, Milk, Mustard.
Ingredients
Levure chimique
52% églefin (poissons), farine de blé, eau, semoule de blé dur, huile de colza, amidon de blé, farine de riz, dextrose, sel, moutarde en poudre, poudres à lever : phosphates de potassium, carbonates de sodium; dextrose, levure, lait en poudre écrémé, extrait d'épices. *Malgré le soin apporté à son élaboration, ce produit est susceptible de contenir des résidus d'arêtes.
Haddock fillets
Haddock (Melanogrammus aeglefinus).
FAQ
Which is healthier: Levure chimique or Haddock fillets?
Overall, Haddock fillets has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Haddock fillets has fewer calories: 109 kcal versus 171 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Haddock fillets has less sugar: 0.5 g versus 1 g per 100 g.