Back bacon vs Unsmoked back bacon
Overall, Back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Back bacon | Unsmoked back bacon |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | — |
| Calories | 166 kcal | 186 kcal |
| Fat | 10.8 g | 12.6 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.2 g | 5 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0.1 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2.9 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | — |
| Protein | 17 g | 17.9 g |
| Additives | 2 | 0 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Back bacon has 11% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 186 kcal).
- Back bacon has 14% less fat (10.8 g vs 12.6 g).
- Back bacon has 16% less saturated fat (4.2 g vs 5 g).
- Back bacon has 25% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.9 g).
- Back bacon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Back bacon
British Pork (86%), Water (10%), Curing Salt (Salt Preservative: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate)
Unsmoked back bacon
Not available.
FAQ
Which is healthier: Back bacon or Unsmoked back bacon?
Overall, Back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Back bacon has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Back bacon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.