Comparison

Back bacon vs Unsmoked back bacon

Overall, Back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 6 of our comparison points versus 0.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBack baconUnsmoked back bacon
Nutri-Score d e
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 166 kcal 186 kcal
Fat 10.8 g 12.6 g
Saturated fat 4.2 g 5 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.1 g
Salt 2.2 g 2.9 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 17 g 17.9 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Back bacon has 11% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 186 kcal).
  • Back bacon has 14% less fat (10.8 g vs 12.6 g).
  • Back bacon has 16% less saturated fat (4.2 g vs 5 g).
  • Back bacon has 25% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.9 g).
  • Back bacon has the better Nutri-Score.

Ingredients

Back bacon

British Pork (86%), Water (10%), Curing Salt (Salt Preservative: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate)

Unsmoked back bacon

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Back bacon or Unsmoked back bacon?

Overall, Back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Back bacon has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 186 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Back bacon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.

More comparisons