Comparison

Back bacon vs Filet de bacon

Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 4 of our comparison points versus 1.

Nutrition per 100 g

NutrientBack baconFilet de bacon
Nutri-Score d d
NOVA group 3 —
Calories 166 kcal 123 kcal
Fat 10.8 g 3.5 g
Saturated fat 4.2 g 1.3 g
Sugars 0.1 g 0.9 g
Salt 2.2 g 2.1 g
Fiber 0.5 g —
Protein 17 g 22 g
Additives20
AllergensNone listedNone listed

Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).

Key differences

  • Filet de bacon has 26% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 166 kcal).
  • Filet de bacon has 68% less fat (3.5 g vs 10.8 g).
  • Filet de bacon has 69% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 4.2 g).
  • Back bacon has 89% less sugar (0.1 g vs 0.9 g).
  • Filet de bacon has 23% more protein (22 g vs 17 g).

Ingredients

Back bacon

British Pork (86%), Water (10%), Curing Salt (Salt Preservative: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate)

Filet de bacon

Not available.

FAQ

Which is healthier: Back bacon or Filet de bacon?

Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.

Which has fewer calories?

Filet de bacon has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 166 kcal per 100 g.

Which has less sugar?

Back bacon has less sugar: 0.1 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.

More comparisons