Back bacon vs Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Overall, Back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Back bacon | Smoked Back Bacon Rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | 3 | 3 |
| Calories | 166 kcal | 227 kcal |
| Fat | 10.8 g | 16.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 4.2 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.1 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.2 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | 0.5 g | 0 g |
| Protein | 17 g | 19.5 g |
| Additives | 2 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Back bacon has 27% fewer calories (166 kcal vs 227 kcal).
- Back bacon has 35% less fat (10.8 g vs 16.5 g).
- Back bacon has 29% less saturated fat (4.2 g vs 5.9 g).
- Back bacon has 14% less salt (2.2 g vs 2.5 g).
- Back bacon has 100% more fiber (0.5 g vs 0 g).
- Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has 13% more protein (19.5 g vs 17 g).
- Back bacon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Back bacon
British Pork (86%), Water (10%), Curing Salt (Salt Preservative: Sodium Nitrite, Potassium Nitrate)
Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Pork loin (97%), salt, preservatives (sodium nitrate, sodium nitrite), antioxidant (sodium ascorbate)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Back bacon or Smoked Back Bacon Rashers?
Overall, Back bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Back bacon has fewer calories: 166 kcal versus 227 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.1 g per 100 g.