Filet de bacon vs Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. It wins on 7 of our comparison points versus 1.
Nutrition per 100 g
| Nutrient | Filet de bacon | Smoked Back Bacon Rashers |
|---|---|---|
| Nutri-Score | d | e |
| NOVA group | — | 3 |
| Calories | 123 kcal | 227 kcal |
| Fat | 3.5 g | 16.5 g |
| Saturated fat | 1.3 g | 5.9 g |
| Sugars | 0.9 g | 0 g |
| Salt | 2.1 g | 2.5 g |
| Fiber | — | 0 g |
| Protein | 22 g | 19.5 g |
| Additives | 0 | 3 |
| Allergens | None listed | None listed |
Green = better value for that nutrient (less sugar, fat, salt and calories; more fiber and protein).
Key differences
- Filet de bacon has 46% fewer calories (123 kcal vs 227 kcal).
- Filet de bacon has 79% less fat (3.5 g vs 16.5 g).
- Filet de bacon has 78% less saturated fat (1.3 g vs 5.9 g).
- Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has no sugar, while Filet de bacon has 0.9 g.
- Filet de bacon has 16% less salt (2.1 g vs 2.5 g).
- Filet de bacon has 11% more protein (22 g vs 19.5 g).
- Filet de bacon has the better Nutri-Score.
Ingredients
Filet de bacon
Not available.
Smoked Back Bacon Rashers
Pork loin (97%), salt, preservatives (sodium nitrate, sodium nitrite), antioxidant (sodium ascorbate)
FAQ
Which is healthier: Filet de bacon or Smoked Back Bacon Rashers?
Overall, Filet de bacon has the better nutritional profile on the measures we compare. We compare Nutri-Score, processing level and seven nutrients per 100 g. Your own needs (for example low sugar or high protein) may make a different choice better for you.
Which has fewer calories?
Filet de bacon has fewer calories: 123 kcal versus 227 kcal per 100 g.
Which has less sugar?
Smoked Back Bacon Rashers has less sugar: 0 g versus 0.9 g per 100 g.